Gerry E. Studds Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary
November 21, 2008 Home | About the Sanctuary | Management | Education & Outreach | Research & Monitoring | Wildlife Watching | Image Gallery | About this Website
about the sanctuary

Sanctuary Location

Office and People

Volunteers and Donors

Calendar of Events

Latest News

Advisory Council
Charter
Members
Working groups
Documents

Frequently Asked Questions

Quiz

Resources & Uses
Maritime Heritage
  Resources

History
Geological
  beginnings

Discovery of the
  bank

Designation
  history

State of the
  Sanctuary

Publications
Press Releases
Stellwagen
  Soundings

Stellwagen
  Banknotes

Fact Sheets
Site
  Characterization
  Report
Staff Publications

Tales From Middle Bank
(an essay series)

Bibliography


Ocean and Dredged Material Disposal

Ocean Disposal

Between 1940 and 1970, several locations throughout Massachusetts Bay were used for the disposal of various industrial waste products, these activities being large unrecorded and unregulated. The disposal of low-level radioactive wastes during the 1940s and 1950s was permitted at four sites within Massachusetts Bay, the most frequently used being the Industrial Waste Site (IWS) at 42 26.8'N X 70 35.0'W. These wastes were generated by academic, commercial and medical institution sources, and there are no real disposal records extant for the period prior to 1952. In 1963, the United States Coast Guard deployed a buoy marking the IWS, and between 1963 and 1975 this area was authorized for toxic and hazardous wastes. In 1975 the IWS buoy was moved one nautical mile east at the request of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE), to the site of the old Massachusetts Bay Disposal site (MBDS) (42 25.7'N X 70 35.0'W).

Dredged Material Disposal

Most harbors and navigation channels of New England require periodic maintenance dredging to remove sediments that accumulate over time. Fine grained sediments, transported by river bedload, stormwater runoff, and tidally driven currents settle in areas of low current velocities creating shoals that must be removed to ensure the safety of vessels. Because these fine grained sediments are not suitable for use as fill or for beach nourishment, the material was often disposed of at numerous locations throughout Massachusetts and Cape Cod bays.

The general vicinity around the site known today as the Massachusetts Bay Disposal Site has been used, since the 1940s, as a dumping area for industrial wastes, construction debris, deliberately sunken derelict vessels, and for some dredged material considered to be "contaminated." The area became known as the "Foul Area" because the dumped material "fouls" or tears fishermen's nets (US EPA,1989).

The Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C.A., 1401 et seq.) gave the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the authority to designate sites where ocean dumping may be permitted. In 1977, the EPA issued ocean dumping regulations for disposal sites, along with a list of sites given interim site designation status. This status was granted to sites that had historically been used as ocean disposal sites. It included the Massachusetts Bay Disposal Site (MBDS) and extended its period of use until 1988. In 1986, the authority to designate ocean disposal sites was delegated by the EPA Administrator to the Regional Administrators. The final designation of the MBDS as an ocean dredged material disposal site was issued in 1993 by the Region I (Boston, MA) Environmental Protection Agency, pursuant to this authority. This designation was made shortly after the final ruling designating as such the Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary in 1992. There was a great deal of controversy over the designation of the MBDS during this period, due to its proximity to the boundaries of the Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary.

The site of the MBDS was moved by the final ruling one nautical mile westward and one-half nautical mile southward of the "old" (interim) MBDS; the area encompasses a circle two nautical miles in diameter, centered at 42 25.1'N X 70 35.0'W. This revision of the MBDS boundaries, EPA stated, was done for several reasons, the first of which was to avoid overlap with the northern area of the historic Industrial Waste Site, where the majority of waste barrels and debris are located. No dredged materials would, therefore, be deposited on top of previously disposed wastes and efforts to devise proper management and/or remediation for these previous dumping sites could continue unhindered. Second, the new boundary encompasses an area outside the "old" MBDS boundaries where sediments have been contaminated by short-dumping. These sediments could, therefore, be covered with cleaner materials as part of the new dredged materials disposal site. Finally, the new location avoids overlap with the "pristine" area at the eastern side of the "old" MBDS, which overlaps with the Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary. The EPA and the National and Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) concluded that designation of the MBDS would not interfere with the Sanctuary.

The MBDS is approved for ocean disposal of dredged material, which must conform to the EPA criteria in the Ocean Dumping Criteria regulations. The site can only be used for disposal following an individual disposal determination which concludes that ocean disposal is an "environmentally appropriate alternative" as compared with other disposal alternatives. Disposal of contaminated materials, as defined by state regulations, is not permitted at the MBDS. An important stipulation made by the EPA is that "capping" of materials which violate the ocean dumping criteria will not be permitted. Therefore, the prohibition on the disposal of contaminated dredged materials at the MBDS may not be overcome by a proposal to "cap" these materials. The EPA states that the efficacy of the capping method is suspect; however, it also notes that this issue could be revisited in the future if new technical data regarding capping methods became available. It has also been noted that a waiver from mandatory compliance with the ocean dumping criteria could be obtained under certain circumstances. If there are no economically feasible alternatives to a particular dumping proposal, EPA is directed to grant a project-specific waiver unless "certain unacceptable environmental harms would result".

 

continue to next section

 

Page last modified by the Stellwagen Web team on
July 23, 2004

Revised July 23, 2004 by NOSWebAdmins@noaa.gov
National Ocean Service | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | U.S. Department of Commerce
http://stellwagen.noaa.gov/about/sitereport/dredge.html